Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Osteoporos Int. 2016 Jun 30;27(12):3513–3524. doi: 10.1007/s00198-016-3681-9

Table 4.

Adjusted odds ratios (AORs) from the random effects models for the intervention vs. usual care group on affirmative responses At 12 weeks

At 52 weeks
Crude Adjusted
Crude Adjusted Crude Adjusted
Patient was on guideline-concordant pharmacotherapy AOR
95 % CI
1.04
(0.93, 1.16)
1.03
(0.91, 1.17)
1.07
(0.96, 1.19)
1.06
(0.93, 1.21)
Patient recalled receiving a letter with their DXA results AOR
95 % CI
3.10***
(2.66, 3.63)
3.14***
(2.71, 3.63)
N/A
Patient correctly identified the results of their baseline DXA AOR
95 % CI
1.44***
(1.29, 1.62)
1.47***
(1.31, 1.64)
1.26**
(1.10, 1.44)
1.27**
(1.11, 1.45)
Patient reported having contact with their provider after their DXA AOR
95 % CI
1.02
(0.92, 1.12)
1.01
(0.91, 1.12)
1.21*
(1.05, 1.40)
1.21*
(1.05, 1.39)
Patient discussed their DXA results with their provider AOR
95 % CI
1.15*
(1.02, 1.30)
1.13
(1.01, 1.27)
1.22**
(1.09, 1.37)
1.24***
(1.11, 1.39)

The covariates that were adjusted for included clinical site, patient age, sex, race, education, self-rated health, COPD, depression, smoking status, alcohol use, weight-bearing exercise, fractures after age 40, parental hip fractures after age 50, prior DXA testing, index FRAX risk, prior diagnoses for osteopenia or osteoporosis, and current or former osteoporosis medication use

*

p < 0.025,

**

p < 0.005,

***

p < 0.0005