Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 28;12(8):e0183518. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183518

Table 5. Simulation results for the location level of contamination in the model(1 − δ)exp(1) + δexp(0.2) in high-dimensional data set.

δ Method r = 0.5 r = 0.85
Med.PMSE C I Med.PMSE C I
0% Lasso 5.170(36.74) 354.096 2.143 2.057(2.12) 374.469 0
E.net 6.704(33.29) 352.160 1 1.982(1.81) 375.198 0
CBPR 2.684(3.97) 368.523 0 1.707(1.49) 376.233 0
RAL 2.878(4.37) 367.174 0 1.677(1.55) 380.644 0
10% Lasso 5.763(35.56) 363.011 0.034 2.160(2.26) 370.476 0.015
E.net 7.306(37.42) 354.849 0 2.072(2.18) 373.299 0
CBPR 3.919(5.57) 359.637 0 1.866(1.66) 372.595 0
RAL 3.881(5.10) 367.295 0 1.892(1.58) 381.919 0
20% Lasso 8.281(32.98) 364.791 0.122 3.300(3.63) 370.232 0
E.net 9.923(37.64) 356.168 0 3.116(3.48) 375.916 0
CBPR 3.682(5.37) 369.929 0 3.947(3.10) 366.586 0
RAL 2.551(4.43) 370.475 0 2.813(2.95) 380.964 0
30% Lasso 13.869(46.19) 361.1 0.233 5.369(6.33) 371.226 0
E.net 15.110(44.32) 347.852 0 5.092(5.55) 375.691 0.108
CBPR 5.566(8.13) 365.307 0 5.391(6.381) 363.874 0
RAL 4.659(7.91) 377.308 0 4.263(4.92) 379.011 0