Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Aug 28.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Intern Med. 2015 Sep 1;163(5):356–364. doi: 10.7326/M15-0817

Appendix Table 1.

Recommendations to the ethics review board and personal preferences on how to obtain consent.

Definitely Written Consent % (95% CI) Probably Written Consent % (95% CI) Probably Alternative Option % (95% CI)* Definitely Alternative Option % (95% CI)*
Recommendation to ethics review board
Overall (N = 2128) 42.0 (39.8 – 44.3) 22.4 (20.6 – 24.4) 22.0 (20.2 – 24.0) 13.5 (12.0 – 15.2)
Drug RCT
 General Notification (n = 503) 45.4 (40.8 – 50.0) 26.1 (22.3 – 30.3) 18.1 (14.6 – 22.3) 10.4 (7.9 – 13.5)
 Verbal Consent (n = 558) 41.0 (36.7 – 45.4) 21.5 (18.0 – 25.4) 23.3 (19.6 – 27.3) 14.3 (11.4 – 17.7)
Dose Timing RCT
  General Notification (n = 544) 36.8 (32.6 – 41.1) 23.6 (19.9 – 27.7) 26.7 (22.9 – 31.0) 13.0 (10.2 – 16.4)
  Verbal Consent (n = 523) 45.6 (41.1 – 50.2) 18.8 (15.5 – 22.5) 19.5 (16.1 – 23.4) 16.2 (13.0 – 19.9)
Personal preference
Overall (N = 2129) 47.7 (45.5 – 50.0) 19.7 (18.0 – 21.5) 18.8 (17.0 – 20.7) 13.8 (12.3 – 15.4)
Drug RCT
  General Notification (n = 503) 52.4 (47.8 – 57.0) 19.2 (15.9 – 23.1) 19.3 (15.7 – 23.6) 9.1 (6.9 – 11.9)
  Verbal Consent (n = 558) 43.6 (39.3 – 48.0) 20.9 (17.5 – 24.8) 19.2 (15.8 – 23.0) 16.3 (13.3 – 19.8)
Dose Timing RCT
  General Notification (n = 545) 45.5 (41.1 – 50.0) 21.8 (18.3 – 25.8) 19.7 (16.2 – 23.6) 13.1 (10.3 – 16.4)
  Verbal Consent (n = 523) 50.2 (45.7 – 54.7) 16.7 (13.6 – 20.3) 17.0 (13.9 – 20.7) 16.1 (13.1 – 19.6)
*

General notification or verbal consent was given as the alternative option based on the arm of the study.