Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Aging. 2017 Mar 23;32(3):278–292. doi: 10.1037/pag0000164

Table 2.

Parameter estimates and goodness-of-fit statistics from the full univariate dual change score models.

Parameters & Fit Anxiety Symbol Digit Figure Identification Thurstone
Constant change =1 =1 =1 =1
Proportional change .05 (.20) 0.11 (0.02)** .16 (.04)** .41 (.07)**
Mean Intercept 48.95 (.79)** 58.72 (.61)** 58.63 (.86)** 55.45(.43)**
Mean Slope −2.19 (9.87) −7.07 (.97)** −9.80 (2.21)** −22.98 (3.65)**
Intercept deviation 36.49 (10.66)** 47.09 (4.42)** 58.76 (5.25)** 35.15 (3.03)**
Slope deviation .67 (.27)* .85 (.19)** 1.89 (.63)** 6.07 (2.03)**
Error deviation 43.80 (3.52)** 18.12 (1.03)** 28.97 (1.42)** 20.78 (1.05)**
Misfit index: -2LL/parameters −9033/15 −9693/15 −9879/15 −9690/15
Parameters & Fit Digits Forward Digits Backward Blocks Rotations
Constant change =1 =1 =1 =1
Proportional change .13 (.08) .17 (.09) .24 (.03)** .16 (.04)**
Mean Intercept 53.28 (.76)** 52.91 (.69)** 57.59 (.53)** 52.59 (.66)**
Mean Slope −7.27 (4.04) −9.36 (4.74)* −14.20 (1.44)** −8.82 (2.06)**
Intercept deviation 58.97 (6.07)** 40.99 (5.35)** 50.95 (3.49)** 59.98 (4.85)**
Slope deviation 1.22 (1.14) 1.36 (.27) 3.17 (.70)** 1.81 (.84)*
Error deviation 47.59 (1.74)** 52.93 (2.52)** 14.82 (.79)** 26.74 (1.17)**
Misfit index: -2LL/parameters −11254/15 −11288/15 −9632/15 −8861/15
**

denotes p <0.01

*

denotes p < 0.05