Table 5.
Potential Contributions of EHR Technology to Medication Error Types and Recommendations
Changes in Error Types | Possible EHR-Related Mechanisms | Human Factors Engineering (HFE) Implications and Recommendations |
---|---|---|
ORDERING | ||
![]() |
- EHR medication ordering screens provide
guidance for entering all necessary order-related information. - Hard stop – all required information fields must be filled for order to be signed. - Default dose, route, frequency information for medication orders |
- The structure of the EHR interface
facilitates entry of required information. However, we need to recognize
the potential negative consequences of this structure as well as hard
stops (see increase in orders with inappropriate or wrong
information). - Hard stops may produce questionable information being entered in the EHR as prescribers are trying to accomplish tasks, sometimes under time pressure. - The provision of default values may reduce omitted information, but may be accepted without sufficient thought [39 40]. |
![]() |
- Medication selection errors due to
pick-lists of medications - Wrong patient - Wrong drug for patient |
- Relevant contextual information should be
provided during ordering (e.g., current list of medications, previously
discontinued medications). - Need for human-centered design of pick lists, including presentation of items on pick list (e.g., need for scrolling, most common medications at top of list) and use of TallMan lettering. - Prescribers could see only one patient at a time, but wrong patient ordering still occurred, possibly related to interruptions. - Provision of clinical decision support (e.g., patient with renal failure) may help to reduce wrong drug ordering for patient. - Making picture of patient visible may help during ordering. |
![]() |
- Design of EHR technology eliminates error-prone abbreviations. | - The EHR design can eliminate errors at the
source. - Need to monitor for re-introduction of ambiguous abbreviations. |
![]() |
- EHR technology eliminates handwriting and makes orders legible. | - The EHR design can eliminate errors at the source. |
![]() |
- The medication order includes default start
times for all medication orders and stop times for selected medications.
Nurses and pharmacists previously specified start times for medication
administration. - Default start times were very soon after the order was entered. Physicians did not always change inappropriate start times and accepted default start times even when not appropriate (for example, a new order is placed to decrease a medication dose with a start time within the hour but the medication dose from the prior order was just administered; so the new dose should start when the next dose was due, not immediately). |
- Implementation of EHR technology needs to
consider the various roles involved in the medication-management process
and clarify who in the process should be responsible, for instance, for
scheduling medication administrations. Physicians may be responsible for
deciding number of days for a medication order. Deciding on specific
start or stop times may be assigned to pharmacists and/or
nurses. - Making it more obvious when default start/stop times are assigned and changed may help the prescribers in ensuring adequate consideration of these default values. |
![]() |
- Identical duplicate orders - Duplicate orders with same medication - Duplicate orders with medication of same therapeutic class [23]. Work system factors that contributed to duplicate orders include [23]: - Multiple clinicians entering orders at the same time on the same patient (e.g., during rounds). - Not being able to see relevant context (e.g., recently placed orders) when ordering. - Duplicate order alerts with high false positives leading to alert fatigue and ignoring true alerts. - Unusable duplicate order alerts. |
- It is important to design not only the EHR
technology, but also the rest of the sociotechnical work system
[11
12]. - Proactive risk analysis should be conducted before implementation [37 38]. - After implementation, continued attention needs to be paid to EHR usability and other HFE issues of continuous technology implementation [41 42]. |
![]() |
- Requirements to renew orders for certain medications were eliminated. | - A consequence of the elimination of renew orders was the continuation of medications for longer than necessary, e.g., intravenous fluids. |
![]() |
- This may be related to the decrease in
orders with omitted information. A negative consequence of structure in
the EHR interface and of hard stops may be inappropriate or wrong
information entered. - Some users may use free-text fields rather than the template sections. |
- Any functionality of the EHR technology has
potential positive and negative consequences. Therefore, proactive risk
analysis needs to be performed before the EHR technology is implemented
[37
38]. - After EHR implementation, continued attention needs to be paid to the use of the technology; this is in line with a continuous technology implementation process [41 42]. |
TRANSCRIPTION | ||
![]() |
- EHR eliminates need for transcription. | - Whenever appropriate, eliminate or automate steps that are potential sources of error. |
DISPENSING | ||
![]() |
- More efficient and timely flow of information from prescribers to pharmacy system; therefore, pharmacy dispenses medications more quickly. | - Interoperable health information technology can eliminate inefficiency and errors due to paper processing. |
ADMINISTRATION | ||
![]() |
- Tighter coupling between time order is
placed and scheduled first dose administration time. - This may be related to the increase in orders with wrong start times. |
- See recommendations about how to reduce orders with wrong start or stop times, including the need to consider the work system and the medication-management process as wholes. |
![]() |
- Increased awareness of medication
administration times due to design of technology - This may be related to the decrease in dispensing errors, especially late medication dispensing. |
- EHR technology may eliminate inefficiency
due to paper processing and support more timely medication
administration. - Improvement in one part of the process may help improve a subsequent part of the process. |
![]() |
- Medication administrations recorded in one EHR component (e.g., respiratory therapy notes) may not be recorded in another component (e.g., MAR). | - Eliminate need for duplicate documentation. |