Table 3.
Main results of the study
| Overall 2D SWE.SSI vs pSWE.ESA | ||
|---|---|---|
| All subjects (n = 108) | Liver disease patients (n = 81) | |
| 2D SWE.SSI median LS (kPa) | 8.4* | 10.4> |
| Range | 3.9–59.6 | 4.0–59.6 |
| pSWE.ESA median LS (kPa) | 8.0* | 10.2> |
| Range | 3.3–44.2 | 3.3–44.2 |
| Lin’s analysis | ||
| CCC (95% CI) | 0.838 (0.772 to 0.887) | 0.819 (0.730 to 0.879) |
| Precision | 0.839 | 0.818 |
| Accuracy | 0.999 | 0.999 |
| Bland–Altman | ||
| Mean (95% CI) (kPa) | −0.2 (−1.3 to 1.0) | −0.2 (−1.7 to 1.3) |
| LoA (kPa) | −11.6 to 11.3 | −13.29 to 12.95 |
| T test (H0: mean = 0) | p = 0.786 | p = 0.820 |
| Bland–Altman % | ||
| Mean (95% CI) (kPa) | 1.0 (−4.6 to 6.7) % | 1.7 (−5.2 to 8.7) % |
| LoA (kPa) | −57.3 to 59.4% | −60.0 to 63.5% |
| T test (H0: mean = 0) | p = 0.716 | p = 0.620 |
Results of Pearson analysis, Lin’s analysis and Bland–Altman analysis are reported in the table including all 108 subjects enrolled and 81 liver disease patients
* p = 0.816; > p = 0.739