Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 3;7(4):557–563. doi: 10.3892/mco.2017.1360

Table III.

Association between expression of Tim-3 on CTLs and the clinicopathological parameters of breast infiltrating ductal carcinoma.

Expression of Tim-3 on CTLs

Variables Patient no. (n=150) Low (%) High (%) χ2 P-value
Age, years 3.160 0.075
  <45 48 18 (37.50) 30 (62.50)
  ≥45 102 24 (23.53) 78 (76.47)
Tumor size 10.177 0.017
  T1 51 15 (29.41) 36 (70.59)
  T2 36   6 (16.67) 30 (83.33)
  T3 60 18 (30.00) 42 (70.00)
  T4 3   3 (100.00)   0 (0.00)
Lymph node status 14.482 0.002
  N0 42   3 (7.14) 39 (92.87)
  N1 69 27 (39.13) 42 (60.87)
  N2 24   6 (25.00) 18 (75.00)
  N3 15   6 (40.00)   9 (60.00)
TNM stage 3.564 0.313
  I 18   3 (16.67) 15 (83.33)
  II 42 12 (28.57) 30 (71.43)
  III 60 15 (25.00) 45 (75.00)
  IV 30 12 (40.00) 18 (60.00)
WHO grade 9.939 0.007
  I 15   9 (60.00)   6 (40.00)
  II 99 27 (27.27) 72 (72.72)
  III 36   6 (16.67) 30 (83.33)
Ki-67 8.615 0.003
  <14% 39 18 (46.15) 21 (53.85)
  ≥14% 111 24 (21.62) 87 (78.38)
Molecular classification 23.636 0.000
  Luminal A 24   9 (37.50) 15 (62.50)
  Luminal B 60 27 (45.00) 33 (55.00)
  HER2-overexpressing 36   6 (16.67) 30 (83.33)
  Basal-like 30   0 (0.00) 30 100.00)
Tim-3 expression on tumor 0.946 0.331
  Low 63 15 (23.80) 48 (76.20)
  High 87 27 (31.03) 60 (68.97)

CTL, cytotoxic lymphocyte; TNM, tumor-node-metastasis; WHO, World Health Organization; HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; Tim-3, T-cell immunoglobulin and mucin domain-3.