Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 14;2017:4180510. doi: 10.1155/2017/4180510

Table 12.

Comparison of results (iris).

Method Best Average Worst
Sánchez and Melin [44] 99.68% 98.68% 97.40%
0.0032 0.0132 0.0260
Sánchez et al. [37] 99.13% 98.22% 96.59%
0.0087 0.0178 0.0341
Proposed GWO 100% 99.31% 98.70%
0 0.0069 0.0130