Table 21.

Table of comparison of optimized results (iris database).

Method	Images for training	Recognition rate
		Best (%)	Average (%)	Worst (%)
Sánchez and Melin [44] (HGA)	Up to 80%	99.68%	98.68%	97.40%
Sánchez et al. [37] (FA)	Up to 80%	99.13%	98.22%	96.59%
Proposed method	Up to 80%	100%	99.31%	98.70%