Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 30;7(16):6188–6200. doi: 10.1002/ece3.3184

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Expected heterozygosity as a function of sample size. Miami‐Dade regional population (n = 48) was subsampled randomly 50 times for each number of individuals. Mean wild expected heterozygosity and maximum wild expected heterozygosity are black reference lines. Blue line is logarithmic best fit