Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 29;7:9808. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-09622-2

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Comparison of SNR between the 19 F-CRP and 19 F/1 H RT-coil. (A) Cross-sectional spin-echo 19F MR images of a TFE phantom acquired with the RT RF coil (left) and the CRP (right). The CRP showed a spatially varying sensitivity that is typical for transceive surface coils. (B) Plots of the SNR profile along the vertical axis at the center of the phantom. For the RT volume resonator (red curve) the SNR was very uniform within the phantom. In contrast, for the CRP the SNR drops rapidly with increasing distance to the RF coil. For this particular reference pulse power, SNR reached its maximum at 2.4 mm from the CRP surface, where it is 15-fold higher than the SNR of the RT coil. Beyond a distance of 8.1 mm the 19 F-CRP did not provide any SNR gain with regard to the 19 F/1 H RT-coil.