Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 29;7:9622. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-08985-w

Table 3.

Parameter values from model fits to CelA and Cel7A assay data conducted on cotton linters having different crystallinity indices (CI).

CI (%) Enzyme k s (h−1) KL (g/L) k i (×10−2 h−1) t1/2 (h)
33 CelA 40 ± 2 100a 2.5b 28
45 CelA 33 ± 1 100a 2.5b 28
66 CelA 33 ± 2 100a 2.5b 28
33 Cel7A 48 ± 6 100a 2.9c 24
45 Cel7A 13 ± 1 100a 2.9c 24
66 Cel7A 6 ± 1 100a 2.9c 24

The model was fit to each progress curve shown in Fig. S2 by varying k i and k s. Best fit values ± standard deviations are shown.

aValue was fixed while estimating values for remaining parameters.

bValue was estimated using a global fit to CelA data all three substrates.

cValue was estimated using a global fit to Cel7A data on all three substrates.