Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 29;7:9622. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-08985-w

Table 5.

Kinetic parameters for CelA tested on DACS in the presence and absence of Tween 20, Tween 80 and BSA. The model was fit to each progress curve shown in Fig. 4 by varying k i and KL. Values shown are best fit values and either their associated standard deviations or 95% confidence intervals.

Additive k s (h−1) KL (g/L) k i (×10−2 h−1) t1/2 (h) t1/2 95% CI (h)
None 55a 1.6 ± 0.3 3.4 21 16–25
Tween 20 55a 1.9 ± 0.2 2.1 33b 28–39
Tween 80 55a 2.3 ± 0.2 2.3 31b 27–35
BSA 55a 2.1 ± 0.5 3.0 23 18–29

aValue was fixed while estimating values for remaining parameters.

bValue is significantly different than control tested in absence of additive (Student’s T-test, p < 0.05).