Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 19;13(5):1121–1129. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2017.68993

Table V.

Performance of the models for predicting all-cause mortality

Variable Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4
Discrimination:
 Δ C statistics, 95% CI Reference 0.005 (–0.015 to 0.025) 0.005 (–0.013 to 0.024) 0.010 (–0.013 to 0.033)
Calibration:
 H-L χ2 = 15.14 p = 0.08 χ2 = 15.45 p = 0.08 χ2 = 13.06 p = 0.16 χ2 = 15.46 p = 0.08
 AIC 939.29 934.58 937.23 933.94
 BIC 956.71 954.49 957.14 956.34
Reclassification:
 IDI, 95% CI Reference 0.017 (–0.001 to 0.056) 0.019 (–0.001 to 0.056) 0.31 (0.003 to 0.082)
 NRI, 95% CI Reference 0.120 (–0.036 to 0.235) 0.107 (–0.073 to 0.266) 0.168 (0.004 to 0.312)

C statistic with only conventional predictors was 0.749. AIC – Akaike information criterion, BIC – Bayesian information criterion, H-L – Hosmer and Lemeshow test, NRI – net reclassification improvement. Model 1 – age, gender, smoking status, diabetes, systolic blood pressure, HDL and total cholesterol. Model 2 – Model 1 + NT-proBNP. Model 3 – Model 1 + RFO. Model 4 – Model 1 + NT-proBNP + RFO.