Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Aug 30.
Published in final edited form as: Cell Biochem Biophys. 2009;53(3):145–157. doi: 10.1007/s12013-009-9046-7

Table 1.

Fluorescence lifetime values for normal versus tumor epithelium

τ1 (ps)
τ2 (ps)
a1
Normal Tumor Normal Tumor Normal Tumor
890 nm excitation
(average shift)
[n = 13]
400
(68)
*
468 2269
(194)
*
2464 50
(1)
51
780 nm excitation
(average shift)
[n = 10]
456
(90)
*
546 2360
(178)
2538 47
(2)
49

Measured using two different excitation wavelengths, 890 nm and 780 nm, the two component fit of the lifetime decay showed that there is always a longer lifetime value in tumor epithelium versus normal. This was true whether or not the fluorophore, NADH or FAD, was in the free or bound state, since both τ1 and τ2 components were longer in duration and there was no change in the fractional contribution (a1) from each decay component. The values in parentheses denote the average difference between normal and tumor measurements. The asterisk denotes that the tumor value is significant compared to the normal value, P < 0.05 for a Students t-test