Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Aug 30.
Published in final edited form as: J Mol Biol. 2016 Feb 23;428(8):1515–1530. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2016.02.020

Table 1.

Characterization of ETV6 variants

Helix H5 sequencea AGADIRb (%) L337
PFc
H5 Avg.
PFd
ΔΔGHX (kcal/mol)e KD (nM)f Fold-increase inhibitiong
ETV6ΔH5 No helix H5 ndh 0.1i
ETV6WT 427TDRLEHLESQVLDE440 0.4 ndh 13 6 ± 1 1
ETV6E434Q TDRLEHLQSQVLDE 0.6 ndh Unfolded H5
ETV6E434D TDRLEHLDSQVLDE 0.4 ndh Unfolded H5
ETV6H432R TDRLERLESQVLDE 1.6 11 17 0.1 30 ± 10 5
ETV6RAE TDRLERLEAEVLDE 3.2 20 23 0.3 90 ± 10 15
ETV62C-ox TDRLEHLESQCLDE 0.4 116 68 1.0 20,000 ± 9000j 3000
a

The amino acid substitutions are bold underlined.

b

AGADIR predicted helical propensity for each given sequence as an isolated polypeptide [17].

c

Measured at 35 °C and 11.7 T (500 MHz) NMR field strength.

d

Measured at 30 °C and pH values of 6.4 and 7.2. PFs of residues 430 to 440 were averaged.

e

ΔΔGHX=ΔGHXmutΔGHXWt, where ΔGHX = RTln(PF) for unfolding to an exchange competent state was calculated from the average PFs for the helix H5 residues 430 to 440.

f

Measured by EMSA with a 23-bp DNA duplex containing the ETS recognition sequence 5′−GGAA−3′. The data are the average ± standard deviation of at least four measurements.

g

Fold increase in autoinhibition with respect to inhibited ETV6WT.

h

Not detected.

i

Value reported [13].

j

Measured by NMR-based titrations using a 15-bp DNA containing a consensus 5′−GGAA−3′ sequence.