Table 2.

ANOVA predicting acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of MBC, N = 326

		Dependent variables
		Acceptability		Appropriateness		Feasibility
Source	df	F	η 2	F	η 2	F	η 2
AC	1	114.1*	.26	20.3*	.06	4.1	.01
AP	1	15.4*	.05	66.0*	.17	4.9	.02
FE	1	0.58	.002	6.0*	.02	143.5*	.31
AC × AP	1	0.59	.002	0.18	.001	0.66	.00
AC × FE	1	0.48	.001	0.24	.001	1.3	.00
AP × FE
AC × AP × FE
Residual	320
		R 2 = .43 (Adj R 2 = .42)		R 2 = .37 (Adj R 2 = .36)		R 2 = .42 (Adj R 2 = .41)

The dependent variables are the acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility 4-item scales. A design error precluded full exploration of two-way and three-way interactions

AC acceptability factor (high versus low, manipulated in vignette), AP appropriateness factor (high versus low, manipulated in vignette), FE feasibility factor (high versus low, manipulated in vignette)

*p < .05