Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Aug;10(8):958–960. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.04.015

TABLE 2.

Ethnic-Specific Associations Between a Positive FH and the Presence and Burden of CAC (>0 and >300): The MASALA and MESA Studies Compared

Odds Ratios for the Presence of Calcification by Race or Ethnicity With a Positive FH (95% Confidence Interval)
MASALA
South Asian
MESA
p Value* p Value
Non-Hispanic White African American Hispanic Chinese American
CAC >0 vs. 0

  Unadjusted 1.14 (0.87–1.51) 1.58 (1.34–1.85) 1.50 (1.24–1.82) 1.66 (1.34–2.06) 1.24 (0.86–1.78) 0.21 0.94
  Model 1 1.02 (0.71–1.45) 1.62 (1.34–1.97) 1.59 (1.28–1.97) 1.59 (1.23–2.05) 1.33 (0.89–1.98) 0.25 0.64

CAC >300 vs. ≤300

  Unadjusted 2.06 (1.28–3.31) 1.66 (1.33–2.06) 1.38 (1.01–1.89) 2.43 (1.69–3.49) 1.47 (0.82–2.66) 0.18 0.35
  Model 1 2.81 (1.60–4.93) 1.82 (1.42–2.33) 1.45 (1.03–2.05) 2.47 (1.65–3.69) 1.63 (0.86–3.10) 0.25 0.52

Values are odds ratios, 95% confidence intervals, and p values.

*

p value for interaction by ethnicity.

p value for interaction by age.

Adjusted for age, sex, tobacco use, diabetes mellitus, systolic blood pressure, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, use of lipid-lowering medications, and use of medication for hypertension.

Abbreviations as in Table 1.