Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 16;2017:7358059. doi: 10.1155/2017/7358059

Table 4.

The cardiac functional parameters of the PC6 group and ST36 group minipigs.

Baseline After operation After acupuncture
PC6 group ST36 group PC6 group ST36 group PC6 group ST36 group
LVEF (%) 71.00 ± 6.47 68.60 ± 3.77 54.75 ± 4.50 47.00 ± 4.91 49.00 ± 1.96 51.80 ± 1.62
LVEDV (ml) 43.58 ± 5.26 37.12 ± 4.50 60.22 ± 7.03 56.22 ± 11.74 72.92 ± 6.65 68.92 ± 5.36■■
LVESV (ml) 13.26 ± 3.26 10.64 ± 1.17 28.79 ± 5.55 28.82 ± 5.96 37.24 ± 2.63 33.16 ± 3.08
Stroke volume (ml) 29.56 ± 4.31 26.48 ± 3.63 33.94 ± 1.02 26.79 ± 6.26 38.06 ± 4.50 35.76 ± 2.72
Cardiac output (l/min) 1.92 ± 0.42 1.63 ± 0.19 2.17 ± 0.11 2.39 ± 0.10 2.13 ± 0.16 1.76 ± 0.06
LVWM (mean) (g) 34.93 ± 6.81 33.31 ± 4.98 35.65 ± 9.31 37.97 ± 5.21 37.16 ± 2.90 45.88 ± 1.74

The cardiac functions were assessed by cMRI at the normal condition, at the 4th week after the operation, and after acupuncture. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (the PC6 group, n = 4, two in the PC6 group were failed to collect the cMRI data completely; the ST36 group, n = 5). P < 0.05 and ■■P < 0.01, compared with their separate baselines of the same group, respectively (P = 0.008, the LVEDV of the ST36 group; P = 0.024, the LVESV of the PC6 group; P = 0.043, the LVESV of the ST36 group; P = 0.017, the LVEF of ST36 group after acupuncture). Data of LVEF, LVEDV, and LVESV of PC6 group were analyzed by t-test, and LVESV of ST36 group was analyzed by Wilcoxon signed-ranks. P < 0.05, compared with that of the PC6 group after acupuncture. The left ventricular wall mass of the ST36 group was significantly greater than that of the PC6 group (P = 0.030). Data were analyzed by t-test.