Table 4.
Baseline | After operation | After acupuncture | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PC6 group | ST36 group | PC6 group | ST36 group | PC6 group | ST36 group | |
LVEF (%) | 71.00 ± 6.47 | 68.60 ± 3.77 | 54.75 ± 4.50 | 47.00 ± 4.91■ | 49.00 ± 1.96 | 51.80 ± 1.62■ |
LVEDV (ml) | 43.58 ± 5.26 | 37.12 ± 4.50 | 60.22 ± 7.03 | 56.22 ± 11.74 | 72.92 ± 6.65 | 68.92 ± 5.36■■ |
LVESV (ml) | 13.26 ± 3.26 | 10.64 ± 1.17 | 28.79 ± 5.55 | 28.82 ± 5.96 | 37.24 ± 2.63■ | 33.16 ± 3.08■ |
Stroke volume (ml) | 29.56 ± 4.31 | 26.48 ± 3.63 | 33.94 ± 1.02 | 26.79 ± 6.26 | 38.06 ± 4.50 | 35.76 ± 2.72 |
Cardiac output (l/min) | 1.92 ± 0.42 | 1.63 ± 0.19 | 2.17 ± 0.11 | 2.39 ± 0.10 | 2.13 ± 0.16 | 1.76 ± 0.06 |
LVWM (mean) (g) | 34.93 ± 6.81 | 33.31 ± 4.98 | 35.65 ± 9.31 | 37.97 ± 5.21 | 37.16 ± 2.90 | 45.88 ± 1.74△ |
The cardiac functions were assessed by cMRI at the normal condition, at the 4th week after the operation, and after acupuncture. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (the PC6 group, n = 4, two in the PC6 group were failed to collect the cMRI data completely; the ST36 group, n = 5). ■P < 0.05 and ■■P < 0.01, compared with their separate baselines of the same group, respectively (P = 0.008, the LVEDV of the ST36 group; P = 0.024, the LVESV of the PC6 group; P = 0.043, the LVESV of the ST36 group; P = 0.017, the LVEF of ST36 group after acupuncture). Data of LVEF, LVEDV, and LVESV of PC6 group were analyzed by t-test, and LVESV of ST36 group was analyzed by Wilcoxon signed-ranks. △P < 0.05, compared with that of the PC6 group after acupuncture. The left ventricular wall mass of the ST36 group was significantly greater than that of the PC6 group (P = 0.030). Data were analyzed by t-test.