Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Burn Care Res. 2017 Sep-Oct;38(5):e807–e813. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000489

Table 3.

Differences in enrollment before and after the intervention.

Prior to intervention Nov 9, 2015–Feb 29, 2016 (112 days) After intervention Mar 1, 2016–June 24, 2016 (115 days) P*

Screened patients, N 139 157

Eligible patients, N
(% of patients screened)
25 (18) 15 (10)

Enrollment, N (% of patients eligible)
Enrolled patients 17 (68) 11 (73) 1.0
  Initial consent by SDM, N (% enrolled)   14 (82)   7 (64)
  Initial consent by self, N (% enrolled)     3 (18)   4 (36)
Non-enrolled patients  8 (32)  4 (27)

Days to initial consent or decline, median, IQR
Days to initial consent by SDM 26.5 (14–41) 3 (3–6) 0.004
Days to initial consent by self 15 (2–30) 3 (2–6) 0.27
Days to decline for non-enrolled patients 12 (6.5–27) 1.5 (1–3.5) 0.026

SDM, surrogate decision maker; IQR, interquartile range.

*

P values were calculated with the Wilcoxon rank sum test for continuous variables and the Fisher exact test for categorical variables.

Patient/SDM declined or patient died/transferred during recruitment