Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 30;12(8):e0183252. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183252

Table 3. Pressure pain thresholds before and during the cold pressor test.

Main group analysis: CTS Control CTS Control
CTS vs control
Before During Before During CPM efficacy CPM efficacy
Percentage difference Percentage difference
1 Thenar 475.2 (204.9) 506.5 (192.2) 459.5 (129.4) 533.9 (162.2) 31.2 (63.1) 74.3 (91.8)
0.095 (0.15) 0.172 (0.20)
Hypothenar 501.9 (213.3) 543.9 (199.9) 520.2 (119.4) 579.2 (211.9) 41.9 (85.9) 59.1 (115.4)
0.127 (0.20) 0.107 (0.18)
2 Thenar 451.4 (166.0) 488.8 (144.4) 450.5 (122.4) 513.1 (129.7) 37.4 (69.0) 62.5 (85.5)
0.117 (0.18) 0.158 (0.20)
Hypothenar 522.1 (241.9) 541.2 (227.4) 483.4 (143.9) 556.5 (189.5) 19.1 (89.9) 73.0 (100.2)
0.072 (0.19) 0.151 (0.20)

Pressure pain thresholds in kPa; data reported as mean (SD). CTS: carpal tunnel syndrome; 1: affected (or most affected) hand for CTS; dominant side for control; 2: unaffected (or least affected) hand for CTS; non-dominant for control; CPM efficacy: difference between PPT measurement before and during cold pressor test. Italic values: relative changes in PPT