Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 30;7:10054. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-10138-y

Table 1.

Summary of diversity indices for all studied samples.

Group Sampling regions Samples Effective Tags No. of OTUs Shannon Chao1 Simpson Good’s coverage ACE Numbers of initial colonies (log CFU/mL)
Z1 Yangling SX1 64,648 111 3.25 103.87 0.84 100.00% 108.65 2.47 ± 0.02
SX11 71,135 162 2.90 135.78 0.80 100.00% 142.84 2.46 ± 0.01
Shangluo SX2 63,674 274 4.07 285.42 0.89 99.90% 293.21 3.40 ± 0.01
SX21 70,765 316 4.02 287.5 0.85 99.90% 294.04 3.41 ± 0.02
Yanan SX3 67,696 152 3.11 150.12 0.81 100.00% 153.64 3.10 ± 0.02
SX31 74,798 135 2.12 129.79 0.61 100.00% 134.66 2.87 ± 0.04
Z2 Fenyang S1 69,111 235 4.18 230.12 0.91 99.90% 243.33 2.47 ± 0.01
S11 66,884 177 2.80 174.62 0.71 99.90% 180.70 3.45 ± 0.02
Zuoquan S2 65,369 172 1.50 208.00 0.36 99.90% 217.57 2.91 ± 0.02
S21 58,762 149 2.14 147.10 0.64 100.00% 150.33 2.98 ± 0.02
Licheng S3 60,511 167 2.76 159.14 0.73 100.00% 161.47 2.93 ± 0.01
S31 58,779 167 3.03 154.50 0.79 100.00% 157.88 3.12 ± 0.02
Z3 Handan HB1 66,109 226 3.07 230.69 0.78 99.90% 233.43 3.36 ± 0.03
HB11 59,317 224 2.81 212.58 0.70 99.90% 224.48 2.51 ± 0.02
Yanshan HB2 68,866 268 3.67 257.24 0.87 99.90% 266.80 3.26 ± 0.01
HB21 68,471 196 3.26 182.73 0.83 99.90% 185.33 2.45 ± 0.02
Z4 Dali YN1 66,955 217 3.95 372.73 0.89 99.90% 390.80 3.48 ± 0.01
YN11 62,216 268 4.33 275.00 0.89 99.90% 280.90 3.44 ± 0.01
Dayao YN2 63,206 240 3.99 273.68 0.89 99.90% 279.32 3.49 ± 0.01
YN21 67,420 308 3.26 195.78 0.81 99.90% 210.25 3.43 ± 0.01
Z5 Aksu XJ1 69,596 207 2.71 210.03 0.67 99.90% 215.49 3.45 ± 0.01
XJ11 72,364 230 3.94 237.00 0.90 99.90% 260.28 3.09 ± 0.01
Hetian XJ2 66,670 286 3.87 286.60 0.89 99.90% 289.19 3.31 ± 0.02
XJ21 69,273 255 3.50 248.69 0.82 99.90% 253.76 3.26 ± 0.01
Z6 Guangyuan SC1 68,211 369 3.95 211.17 0.90 99.90% 223.75 2.45 ± 0.01
SC11 65,657 282 3.78 247.45 0.85 99.90% 252.48 2.46 ± 0.01
Ganzi SC2 69,974 274 3.53 254.20 0.82 99.90% 264.86 2.44 ± 0.01
SC21 71,128 197 4.21 284.61 0.90 99.90% 300.92 3.13 ± 0.01

Microbial counts of walnuts samples were the means of two replicates, expressed as log CFU/mL. All the samples with “1, 2, and 3” represent the walnuts harvested in 2015; all the samples with “11, 21, and 31” represent the fresh walnuts in 2016.