Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 30;17:599. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3580-2

Table 5.

Linear regression model on the association of self-reported femininity issues, psychosocial issues and sociodemographic variables on SH in BCS (n = 105)

Predictors SIDI-F R2 e = 38.4%
β t Pf 95% CL
BISa −0.064 −0.67 0.505
MENQOLb
 Vasomotor −004 −0.431 0.668
 Psychosocial −0.13 −1.028 0.307
 Physical −0.144 −1.378 0.652
HADS-depressionc −.94 2.7 0.008 −1.646-0.238
HADS-anxietyc 0.108 0.948 0.346
Satisfaction with partnershipd 3.664 5.2 <0.001 2.27-5.05
Menopausal state (pre- vs. post menpausal)g −0.069 −0.496 0.621
Ageg −.307 −2.1 0.039 −0.585-0.028
Marital state (with vs. without partnership)g −0.17 −1.154 0.124
Education (less vs. more than compulsory school)g 0.072 0.799 0.427
Time since diagnosis 0.012 0.137 0.892

aBody image scale

bMenopause-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire

cHospital anxiety and Depression Scale

dderived from the SIDI-diagnostic question on partnership satisfaction

eR2: explained variance by the model

f p value below 0.05 was considered significant

gdichotomous variables

CL: 95% confidence interval