Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 30;7(6):e013993. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013993

Table 2.

Proportional hazards models of time to all deaths by FFI, VACS Index, CES-D, age group and potential confounders among HIV+ women who are not ART naïve.

Variable Crude HR (95% CI) χ2 p Value
Univariate analyses of indices
 VACS score (0–164), per 20 points 2.20 (1.98 to 2.45) 214.6 <0.0001
  FFI 3–5 vs 0–2 3.92 (2.92 to 5.26) 83.2 <0.0001
  CES-D (<16 vs >16) 2.07 (1.55 to 2.77) 24.0 <0.0001
Univariate analyses of potential confounders
 Age per decade 1.62 (1.38, 1.89) 36.14 <0.0001
 Race/ethnicity 8.95 (2 df) 0.011
 White versus black 0.55 (0.37, 0.83) 8.02 0.005
 Others versus black 0.74 (0.49, 1.11) 2.15 0.140
 Education >high school versus <high school 0.68 (0.51, 0.90) 6.96 0.008
 Smoking (current vs no) 3.41 (2.49, 4.69) 57.5 <0.0001
 Income (<$12 000 vs >$12 000) 2.03 (1.49, 2.77) 19.8 <0.0001
 Drinking 27.25 (3 df) <0.0001
 Low versus abstainer/none 0.59 (0.42, 0.84) 8.59 0.003
 Moderate versus abstainer/none 1.27 (0.82, 1.98) 1.14 0.290
 High versus abstainer/none 3.48 (1.76, 6.87) 12.9 0.0003
 BMI, kg/m2 (>30 vs <30) 0.57 (0.41, 0.81) 10.2 0.001

ART, antiretroviral therapies; BMI, body mass index; CES-D, Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression; df, degrees of freedom; FFI, Fried Frailty Index; HIV+, HIV-infected; VACS, Veterans Aging Cohort Study.