Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Aug 31.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Surg Pathol. 2016 Nov;40(11):1457–1472. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000719

Table 1. Clinicopathologic Features of TC-PD RCCs.

Case # Classification Age [y] Sex Side HLRCC?# Size [cm] pT Stage& Node Status$ Metastasis@ Progression [mo]ˆ Status% Follow-Up (mo)
TC-D 1 FH-D 18 M R - 10 - - - - - -
TC-D 2 FH-D 20 M L No 12.5 pT3b Neg Li 1 DOD 25
TC-D 3 FH-D 25 M R No 15.5 pT3a Neg Li, Lu, Bn, Adr P DOD 8
TC-D 4 FH-D 40 M L Fam, RCC 3.7 pT3a - Li P AWD 2
TC-D 5 FH-D 42 M L No 5 pT3a I Bn P AWD 16
TC-D 6 FH-D 42 F R No 6 pT3a R Li, R P DOD 2
TC-D 7 FH-D 42 F L UM 4.1 pT3a Neg Lu, E, CW P DOD 3
TC-D 8 FH-D 44 M R No 10.5 pT3a Neg - - NED 2
TC-D 9 FH-D 45 F R No 5.5 pT3 Neg Lu, Li, R, Bn, M, O 10 DOD 43
TC-D 10 FH-D 46 M L No 8.5 pT3a A Bn, Lu, Li, T, A P DOD -
TC-D 11 FH-D 46 M R No 10 pT3c Neg Li 4 DOD 25
TC-D 12 FH-D 52 M L - 12 pT4 Neg - - LTF -
TC-D 13 FH-D 53 M R Fam, MCL 6 pT3a C - - LTF 4
TC-D 14 FH-D 59 M L No 16 pT2b Neg None - LTF -
TC-D 15 FH-D 61 M L - 14 pT2 Neg Li, Bn, C 2 AWD 68
TC-D 16 FH-D 67 M R No 10 pT3a R Li, Lu 6 DOD 6
TC-D 17 FH-D* 34 F L No 3.7 pT1a - Lu 4 AWD 10
TC-D 18 FH-D* 40 F L No 6 pT1b Neg - - DNOS -
TC-D 19 FH-D* 71 M R No 8 pT3a U - - DOD 16
TC-D 20 FH-S 16 F R No 6.5 pT1b Neg None - NED 126
TC-D 21 FH-S 35 M L No 14 pT3 A Adr, Bn, E P DOD 9
TC-D 22 FH-S 50 M R No 21 pT2b Neg Lu 8 DOD 10
TC-D 23 FH-S 53 M R No 13 pT3 Neg P, R - AWD 5
TC-D 24 FH-S 53 F L No 3.3 pT3a - - - AWD 2
TC-D 25 FH-R 70 M R No 11.7 pT3a - Adr P AWD 0
TC-D 26 FH-R 71 M R No 8.5 pT3a U Lu, Li P AWD 0
TC-D 27 FH-R 74 M L No 4.5 pT3a - Lu , Bn - LTF -
TC-D 28 FH-R 80 F R No 5.5 pT3a A Lu , Bn 8 DOD 15
TC-D 29 FH-R 86 M R No 3 pT3a - None 0 NED 7

Abbreviations: ‘-’, no data; TC-PD, tubulocystic carcinoma with poorly differentiated foci; FH, fumarate hydratase; RCC, renal cell carcinoma; IHC, immunohistochemistry;

Classification – Final integrating IHC and molecular findings; FH-D, FH-deficient RCC; FH-S, FH-suspicious RCC; FH-R, FH-retained RCC, * indicates IHC suspicious case reclassified as FH-D based on NGS findings

#

HLRCC: includes any evidence of HLRCC, whether stigmata apparent clinically (UM-uterine leiomyomatosis) or family history (Fam), RCC, renal cell carcinoma; MCL, multiple cutaneous leiomomas) reported, see Table 3.

&

pTNM: Classification by AJCC 2010 TNM Staging System

$

Lymph Node Metastasis: nodal apparent at surgical staging; -, no data; Neg, negative; I, positive iliac node; R, positive retroperitoneal node; AC, positive aortic/caval lymph node; S, sinus; Re, positive “regional” lymph node; U, positive unspecified node; lymph node metastasis evolving during follow-up is included only in “Metastatc Site”

@

Metastatic Site: metastatic sites apparent either at presentation or evolving during follow-up; Li, liver; Lu, lung; Bn, bone; R, retroperitoneal node; E, malignant effusion; CW, chest wall; M, mediastinal node; O, ovary; T, thoracic LN; Ab, abdominal LN; C, cervical LN; Sp, spleen; P, pancreas;

ˆ

Progression: time to first metastatic progression, months; P, metastatic at presentation

%

Status: last available status at followup; DOD, dead of disease; NED, no evidence of disease; LTF, lost to follow-up; AWD, alive with disease; DNOS, dead, not otherwise specified