Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 15;18(8):1525. doi: 10.3390/ijms18081525

Table 1.

Association between RPRM methylation of CGIs and clinicopathological features.

Clinicopathological Features n Methylation of RPRM CGIs p
Low High
Age (year; mean 60) 77 0.021
≤60 43 23 (71.9%) 20 (44.4%)
>60 34 9 (28.1%) 25 (55.6%)
Tumor Size * 76 0.586
T1 + T2 58 23 (39.7%) 35 (60.3%)
T3 + T4 18 9 (50.0%) 9 (50.0%)
Lymph node metástasis * 76 0.247
No 35 12 (34.3%) 23 (65.7%)
Yes 41 20 (48.4%) 21 (51.2%)
TNM Stage * 76 0.621
I + II 51 20 (39.2%) 31 (60.8%)
III + IV 25 12 (48.0%) 13 (52.0%)
Elston Grade * 75 0.239
Well differentiated 14 5 (35.7%) 9 (64.3%)
Moderately differentiated 34 12 (35.3%) 22 (64.7%)
Poorly differentiated 27 15 (55.6%) 12 (44.4%)
Estrogen receptor α * 74 0.000
ERα-negative 24 18 (75.0%) 6 (25.0%)
ERα-positive 50 14 (28.0%) 36 (72.0%)
Progesterone receptor * 74 0.034
PR-negative 35 20 (57.1%) 15 (42.9%)
PR-positive 39 12 (30.8%) 27 (69.2%)
Her2/neu * 65 1.000
Her2-negative 62 29 (46.8%) 33 (53.2%)
Her2-positive 3 2 (66.7%) 1 (33.3%)
Ki67 * 63 0.062
Low 50 19 (38.0%) 31 (62.0%)
High 13 9 (69.2%) 4 (30.8%)
Molecular Subtype * 67 0.001
Luminal A 30 6 (20.0%) 24 (80.0%)
Luminal B 15 7 (46.7%) 8 (53.3%)
Her2-positive 3 2 (66.7%) 1 (33.3%)
TNBC 19 14 (77.8%) 4 (22.2%)

* Several cases were excluded from that analysis due by missing information such as tumor size (1), lymph node metastasis (1), TNM stage (1), Elston grade (2), estrogen receptor α (3), progesterone receptor (3), Her2/neu (12), Ki-67 (14), and molecular subtype (10). RPRM, Reprimo.