Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Aug 31.
Published in final edited form as: J Neural Eng. 2012 Apr 10;9(3):036002. doi: 10.1088/1741-2560/9/3/036002

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Actual and predicted finger position by (a) KF, (b) MTM and (c) mKFT for a sample reach at the three simulated injury levels. In this example, R2 for C6, C5 and C4 respectively were: (a) all 0.98; (b) 0.99, 0.99, 0.98 and (c) 0.91, 0.89, 0.83. The target VAFs were: (a) 0.96, 0.97, 0.96; (b) 0.96, 0.97, 0.90; (c) 0.81, 0.72, 0.14.