Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 1;6(2):143–148. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10018-1187

Table 4: Main endoscopic findings according to appropriateness of the indication

Endoscopic finding   Not appropriate indications, n (%)   Appropriate indications, n (%)   OR (99% CI)  
Clinically relevant                    
 1. Erosive esophagitis   17 (4)   91 (15.4)   4.40 (2.18–8.87)*  
 2. Erosive gastritis   46 (10.7)   67 (11.3)   1.06 (0.63–1.79)  
 3. Esophageal varices   0 (0)   10 (1.7)   15.47 (0.37–645.5)  
 4. Duodenal ulcer   9 (2.1)   91 (15.4)   8.47 (3.39–21.17)*  
 5. Barrett’s esophagus   14 (3.3)   3 (0.5)   0.15 (0.029–0.78)*  
 6. Gastric ulcer   0 (0)   18 (3)   27.64 (0.68–1111.64)  
 7. Erosive duodenitis   37 (8.6)   66 (11.2)   1.32 (0.76–2.31)  
 8. Gastric polyps   16 (3.7)   13 (2.2)   0.57 (0.21–1.53)  
 9. Gastric cancer   0 (0)   7 (1.2)   10.99 (0.25–474.45)  
 10. Esophageal cancer   0 (0)   10 (1.7)   15.47 (0.37–645.55)  
 11. Esophageal stenosis   6 (1.4)   3 (0.5)   0.35 (0.05–2.23)  
Not clinically relevant                    
 1. Normal   246 (57.4)   89 (15)   0.13 (0.08–0.19)*  
 2. Nonerosive gastritis   12 (2.8)   65 (11)   4.28 (1.87–9.79)*  
 3. Non erosive duodenitis   0 (0)   6 (1)   9.51 (0.21–417.96)  
 4. Hiatus hernia   25 (5.8)   52 (8.8)   1.55 (0.81–2.97)  
Total   428   591        

*p < 0.01