Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: ASAIO J. 2017 Sep-Oct;63(5):637–643. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000000616

Table II.

Comparison of similar size membrane lungs

Membrane
Lung
Fiber
Surface
Area
(m2)
Priming
Volume
(mL)
Maximum or
Rated Flow
(L/min)
∆P at Rated
Flow*
(mmHg)
O2 Transfer at
Rated Flow**
(mLO2 min−1)
O2 Transfer
Efficiency***
(mLO2 min−1/m2)
Terumo Capiox RX05 0.5 43 1.5 1101 75 150
Maquet Quadrox-i Neonatal 0.38 40 1.5 582 75 197
Maquet Quadrox-i Pediatric 0.8 99 2.8 603*1.5 L/min 140 175
Medos Hilite 1000 0.39 57 1.0 Data not available 50 128
Medos Hilite 2800 0.8 98 2.8 Data not available 140 175
Sorin Dideco D100 0.22 47 0.7 175 35 159
Sorin Dideco D101 0.61 115 2.5 155 125 204
Pedipump Lung 0.3 110 2.5 150 120 400
M-Lung 0.28 47 2.0 106 100 357
*

If ∆P data was not available at rated flow, the flow rate for the ∆P in the table is specified;

**

Rated flow is flow of standardized venous blood at which outlet blood oxygen saturation is 95%;

***

O2 transfer efficiency = O2 transfer at rated flow (mLO2 min−1) per fiber surface area (m2). Data for commercial devices were obtained from manufacturer manuals for each device. Data for the pedipump lung is taken or calculated from reference 19.

1

J. Dubois, L. Jamaer, U. Mees, J.-L. Pauwels, F. Briers, J. Lehaen, and M. Hendrikx, Perfusion 19, 315 (2004).

2

R.M. Ginther, R. Gorney, and R. Cruz, Perfusion 28, 194 (2013).

3

R.K. Mathis, J. Lin, N.M. Dogal, F. Qiu, A. Kunselman, S. Wang, and A. Ündar, Perfusion 27, 470 (2012).