Table 2.
Group | Genus | Relative Abundance (%)a | Log2FoldChange (SE) | p value | q value b |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 vs. 2 | Unclassified Leuconostocaceae | 0.14 | 5.29 (0.91) | 6.27 × 10−9 | 4.02 × 10−7 |
Mitsuokella | 0.24 | 4.46 (1.14) | 8.91 × 10−5 | 2.85 × 10−3 | |
Klebsiella | 0.36 | −3.00 (0.90) | 8.49 × 10−4 | 1.81 × 10−2 | |
1 vs. 3 | Mitsuokella | 0.24 | 4.84 (1.26) | 1.24 × 10−4 | 3.85 × 10−2 |
Fusobacterium | 0.20 | 5.74 (1.49) | 1.19 × 10−4 | 3.85 × 10−2 | |
1 vs. 2 + 3 | Unclassified Leuconostocaceae | 0.14 | 4.73 (0.81) | 4.39 × 10−9 | 2.85 × 10−7 |
Mitsuokella | 0.24 | 4.35 (1.01) | 1.73 × 10−5 | 5.62 × 10−4 | |
Klebsiella | 0.36 | −2.41 (0.76) | 1.57 × 10−3 | 3.40 × 10−2 | |
1 + 2 vs. 3 | Fusobacterium | 0.20 | 4.68 (1.07) | 1.25 × 10−5 | 8.10 × 10−4 |
Unclassified Clostridiales | 4.10 | −1.11 (0.31) | 3.88 × 10−4 | 1.26 × 10−2 | |
Unclassified Leuconostocaceae | 0.14 | −2.83 (0.87) | 1.17 × 10−3 | 2.53 × 10−2 |
The results of between group 2 and group 3 were not shown because there is no taxon with significant difference (q value <0.05)
aRelative abundance in total 63 samples
b q value <0.05, the q values were calculated using Benjamini-Hochberg correction (FDR)