Fig. 1.

Examples of nodules uniformly considered as the most suspicious nodule per participant by all three systems. Each row depicts a nodule, displayed in the axial (left) and coronal (right) plane and centered in the images with a field of view of 60 x 60 mm. (A) Benign pure ground-glass nodule, D^longest-C 10.0 mm, D^mean3D 9.4 mm, D^meanAxial 8.8 mm, PanCan model nodule index score of 5.5%, Lung-RADS category 2 and NCCN category 3; (B) Benign part-solid nodule, D^longest-C total nodule 9.4 mm and solid component 7.2 mm, D^mean3D total nodule 8.5 mm and solid component 6.2 mm, D^meanAxial total nodule 8.8 mm and solid component 6.0 mm, PanCan model nodule index score of 10.0%, Lung-RADS category 4A and NCCN category 6; (C) Benign solid nodule, D^longest-C 10.5 mm, D^mean3D 8.4 mm, D^meanAxial 9.1 mm, PanCan model nodule index score of 4.4%, Lung-RADS category 4A and NCCN category 6. (D) Malignant pure ground-glass nodule, D^longest-C 12.4 mm, D^mean3D 9.8 mm, D^meanAxial 11.7 mm, PanCan model nodule index score of 8.4%, Lung-RADS category 2 and NCCN category 4; (E) Malignant part-solid nodule, D^longest-C total nodule 17.4 mm and solid component 7.1 mm, D^mean3D total nodule 14.7 mm and solid component 5.2 mm, D^meanAxial total nodule 15.7 mm and solid component 6.3 mm, PanCan model nodule index score of 22.2%, Lung-RADS category 3 and NCCN category 6; F: Malignant solid nodule, D^longest-C 15.2 mm, D^mean3D 13.5 mm, D^meanAxial 13.2 mm, PanCan model nodule index score of 18.1%, Lung-RADS category 4A and, NCCN category 6