Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 26;9(8):802. doi: 10.3390/nu9080802

Table 4.

Comparison between measured, estimated, prescribed and delivered calories and proteins.

All Patients (n IC = 130; n PCR = 123) On MV (n IC = 113) All on RRT (n IC = 38; n PCR = 39) RRT-MV (n IC = 31) No RRT (n IC = 92; n PCR = 84) No RRT+ MV (n IC = 83)
IC 1724 (431) 1771 (431) 1730 (445) 1798 (469) 1722 (428) 1762 (420)
Equations
 - Harris-Benedict with stress factor 2057 (436) a NA 2002 (277) a NA 2079 (286) c NA
 - Harris-Benedict 1582 (335) a NA 1540 (213) c NA 1599 (374) a NA
 - 25 kcal/kg 2116 (560) a NA 2174 (463) a NA 2092 (596) a NA
 - Faisy-Fagon NA 2089 (280) a NA 2119 (180) a NA 2079 (307) a
 - Penn State NA 1793 (392) NA 1866 (271) NA 1796 (427)
Prescribed 1575 (672) a 1618 (682) b 1593 (561) 1659 (552) 1568 (716) b 1603 (724) b
Received 1439 (680) b 1475 (690) a 1443 (568) c 1470 (580) c 1438 (724) c 1476 (727) c
ANOVA <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001
PCR g/24 h 102.1 (38.7) NA 89.5 (29.3) NA 107.9 (41.1) NA
nPCR (g/kg) * 1.2 (1.09, 0.4–2.7) NA 1.0 (0.8, 0.4–2.3) NA 1.3 (1.2, 0.6–2.7) NA
Calculated protein need * 108.3 (46.2) NA 154.0 (51.8) d NA 87.1 (25.7) d NA
Prescribed protein * 76.5 (37.3) d NA 83.7 (30.1) NA 73.2 (40.0) d NA
Received protein * 69.2 (35.3) d NA 76.7 (31.0) e NA 66.2 (37.0) d NA
ANOVA <0.0001 NA <0.0001 NA <0.0001 NA

a p < 0.0001 vs. IC; b p < 0.05 vs. IC; c p < 0.01 vs. IC; d p < 0.0001 vs. PCR; e p = 0.0222 vs. PCR RRT; * G of protein/24 h. Data expressed as mean ± SD or mean (median, range) in the case of nPCR. IC, indirect calorimetry; MV, mechanical ventilation; NA, non applicable; RRT, renal replacement therapy. nPCR, normalized protein catabolic rate; PCR, protein catabolic rate.