Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 31;5:110. doi: 10.1186/s40168-017-0323-1

Table 10.

Mean/standard deviation of the optimum loss scores for each true subcommunity under two different methods, with 10 simulations for each sample size

Sample size Cluster M1−M10 M9−M18 M17−M26
n=50 NMF 3/1.8 7.2/2 2.4/1.9
Co-occurrence network 5.4/2.4 7.5/0.8 3.5/1.6
n=100 NMF 2.7/1.3 6.8/2.2 2.1/1.4
Co-occurrence network 6.7/2.2 6/1.6 4.5/1.7
n=200 NMF 2.7/0.9 6.1/2 1.5/1.2
Co-occurrence network 6.9/1.7 6.6/2.1 6.3/1.3