Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 15;44(2):201–215. doi: 10.1177/0300060515621638

Table 1.

Basic characteristics of participants and details of the 12 studies included in a meta-analysis comparing intramedullary fixation (IF) with plate fixation (PF) for midshaft clavicle fracture.

Author Country, region Publication year IF n PF n IF age (range) PF age (range) IF, M/F PF, M/F Follow-up, months
Narsaria India 2014 33 32 38.9 ± 9.1 (20–62) 40.2 ± 11.2 (18–64) 24/9 26/6 >24
Liu35 China, Taiwan 2010 51 59 33.6 ± 13.5 31.7 ± 9.7 32/19 29/30 >12
Fu25 China, Taiwan 2012 53 50 35.2 ± 14.5 39.9 ± 14.8 38/15 33/17 >12
Ko36 Republic of Korea 1999 13 18 36.6 (23–68) 43.3 (18–74) NP NP >12
Lee J26 USA 2014 43 67 27.6 (14–59) 31.7 (16–68) 29/5 63/4 >15
Wenninger27 USA 2013 33 29 25.2 (18–51) 26.9 (20–49) 32/1 26/3 >12
Assobhi34 Egypt 2011 19 19 30.3 ± 4.8 (24–45) 32.6 ± 5.9 (26–49) 16/3 17/2 >12
Wijdicks28 The Netherlands 2012 47 43 33.1 ± 15.6 39.4 ± 14.1 33/14 33/10 >12
Ferran43 UK 2010 17 15 23.8 (13–42) 35.4 (16–53) 14/3 13/2 12.4 (mean)
Kleweno39 USA 2011 18 14 35 (16–56) 28 (16–46) 15/3 10/4 >12
Chen15 China 2012 57 84 34.3 (20–59) 36.5 (19–63) 41/16 61/23 >24
Lee Y18 China, Taiwan 2008 56 32 40.1 38.2 37/19 20/12 >12

PF, plate fixation; IF, intramedullary fixation; M, male patients; F, female patients.