Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 29;23(2):66–75. doi: 10.1016/j.jpge.2015.10.005

Table 2.

Comparison of the two main groups of SEMS placement (SEMS as bridge-to-surgery vs palliative SEMS).

Outcomes Total
(n = 85)
SEMS as bridge-to-surgery
(n = 35)
Palliative SEMS
(n = 50)
p Value
Technical success, n (%) 85 (94.4)
Clinical success, n (%) 59 (69.4) 29 (82.9) 30 (60.0) 0.024
Complications, n (%)a 26 (30.6) 6 (17.1) 20 (40.0) 0.024
 Stent occlusion 16 (18.8) 3 (8.6) 13 (26.0) 0.043
 Stent migration 8 (9.4) 3 (8.6) 5 (10.0) 1.000
 Bowel perforation 6 (7.1) 0 6 (12.0) 0.040
Early complications, n (%) 12 (44.4) 3 (50.0) 9 (42.9) 1.000
Late complications, n (%) 16 (59.3) 3 (50.0) 13 (61.9) 0.662
Reinterventions, n (%) 26 (30.6) 6 (17.1) 20 (40.0) 0.024
 Urgent surgery 11 (42.3) 1 (16.7) 10 (50.0) 0.197
 Stent reinsertion 15 (57.7) 5 (83.3) 10 (50.0) 0.197
Mortality, n (%)
 30-day mortality 8 (16.3) 1 (10.0) 7 (17.9) 1.000
 Overall mortality 49 (61.3) 10 (31.3) 39 (81.3) 0.001
Survival (days), mean ± SD (range) 853.3 ± 125.8 (2–2684) 1620.4 ± 237.2 (18–2684) 421.3 ± 83.9 (2–1931) 0.001
Stent patency (days), mean ± SD (range) 154.5 ± 151.8 (1–553)
Time to surgery (days), mean ± SD (range) 21.1 ± 18.7 (3–77)
a

More than one patient had more than one complication.