Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 29;23(2):66–75. doi: 10.1016/j.jpge.2015.10.005

Table 3.

Comparison of outcomes obtained with elective surgery after SEMS placement vs. urgent surgery.

Outcomes Total
(n = 106)
Elective surgery after SEMS placement
(n = 35)
Urgent surgery
(n = 71)
p
Clinical success, n (%) 84 (79.2) 28 (80.0) 55 (77.5) 0.766
Type of surgery, n (%) 0.006
 Hartmann's procedure 34 (32.1) 5 (14.3) 29 (40.8)
 Segmentectomy 72 (67.9) 30 (85.7) 42 (59.2) 0.038
Primary anastomosis 72 (82.8) 30 (93.8) 42 (76.4)
Colostomy rate, n (%) 48 (45.3) 9 (25.7) 39 (54.9) 0.004
Postoperative complications, n (%)a 45 (42.5) 12 (34.3) 33 (46.5) 0.232
Early complication, n (%) 38 (82.6) 9 (75.0) 29 (85.3) 0.412
Late complication, n (%) 15 (32.6) 3 (25.0) 12 (35.3) 0.513
Overall complications, n (%) 53 (50.0) 16 (45.7) 37 (52.1) 0.536
Reinterventions, n (%) 23 (21.7) 7 (20.0) 16 (22.5) 0.766
 Emergent surgery 21 (87.5) 5 (62.5) 16 (100) 0.028
 Elective surgery 4 (16.7) 2 (25.0) 2 (12.5) 0.578
Hospital stay (days), mean ± SD (range) 23.37 ± 26.05 (1–179) 25.9 ± 20.3 (1–91) 22.2± 28.4 (2–179) 0.034
Mortality, n (%)
 30-day mortality 8 (18.2) 1 (10.0) 7 (20.6) 0.659
 Overall mortality 44 (47.8) 10 (31.3) 34 (56.7) 0.020
a

More than one patient had more than one complication.