Table 3.
Top three search strategies yielding highest sensitivity (keeping specificity >50%) with combinations of terms
Search strategy in Ovid format | Sensitivity (%) (95% CI) | Specificity (%) (95% CI) | Precision (%) (95% CI) | Accuracy (%) (95% CI) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Clinical trial.mp. OR clinical trial.pt. OR random:.mp. OR tu.xs. | 99.3 (98.7 to 99.8) | 70.4 (69.8 to 70.9) | 9.9 (9.3 to 10.5) | 71.3 (70.8 to 71.8) |
Clinical trial.pt. OR random:.tw. OR tu.xs. | 99.1 (98.6 to 99.7) | 71.0 (70.4 to 71.5) | 10.0 (9.4 to 10.6) | 71.8 (71.3 to 72.4) |
Clinical trial.pt. OR random:.mp. OR tu.fs. | 98.9 (98.3 to 99.6) | 79.7 (79.3 to 80.2) | 13.8 (12.9 to 14.6) | 80.3 (79.9 to 80.8) |
mp=multiple posting (term appears in title, abstract, or MeSH heading); pt=publication type; tu=therapeutic use subheading; xs=exploded subheading; :=truncation; tw=textword (word or phrase appears in title or abstract); fs=floating subheading.