Skip to main content
. 2005 May 21;330(7501):1179. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38446.498542.8F

Table 3.

Top three search strategies yielding highest sensitivity (keeping specificity >50%) with combinations of terms

Search strategy in Ovid format Sensitivity (%) (95% CI) Specificity (%) (95% CI) Precision (%) (95% CI) Accuracy (%) (95% CI)
Clinical trial.mp. OR clinical trial.pt. OR random:.mp. OR tu.xs. 99.3 (98.7 to 99.8) 70.4 (69.8 to 70.9) 9.9 (9.3 to 10.5) 71.3 (70.8 to 71.8)
Clinical trial.pt. OR random:.tw. OR tu.xs. 99.1 (98.6 to 99.7) 71.0 (70.4 to 71.5) 10.0 (9.4 to 10.6) 71.8 (71.3 to 72.4)
Clinical trial.pt. OR random:.mp. OR tu.fs. 98.9 (98.3 to 99.6) 79.7 (79.3 to 80.2) 13.8 (12.9 to 14.6) 80.3 (79.9 to 80.8)

mp=multiple posting (term appears in title, abstract, or MeSH heading); pt=publication type; tu=therapeutic use subheading; xs=exploded subheading; :=truncation; tw=textword (word or phrase appears in title or abstract); fs=floating subheading.