Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: JAMA Oncol. 2017 May 1;3(5):628–635. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.5917

Table 3.

Association of Vitamin D3 Supplementation With Risk of Advanced Adenoma Stratified by 2 VDR Genotypes

SNP VDR Genotype Participants, No. (%) No. With Advanced Adenoma/Total No. (%) RR (95% CI)a P Valuea P Valueb
No Vitamin D Vitamin D
rs7968585 (n = 1687) AA 436 (25.8) 32/222 (14.4) 11/214 (5.1) 0.36 (0.19–0.69) .002 .001
AG 837 (49.6) 31/422 (7.4) 43/415 (10.4) 1.41 (0.90–2.19) .13
GG 414 (24.5) 17/198 (8.6) 27/216 (12.5) 1.42 (0.79–2.53) .24
AG or GGc 1251 (74.1) 48/620 (7.7) 70/631 (11.1) 1.41 (0.99–2.00) .05 <.001
rs731236 (Taq1) (n = 1671) TT 631 (37.8) 24/306 (7.8) 38/325 (11.7) 1.44 (0.89–2.35) .14 .001
CT 788 (47.2) 37/402 (9.2) 36/386 (9.3) 1.02 (0.66–1.58) .94
CC 252 (15.1) 19/126 (15.1) 4/126 (3.2) 0.22 (0.07–0.63) .005

Abbreviations: RR, relative risk; SNP, single-nucleotide polymorphism.

a

Relative risk for the effect of vitamin D3 supplementation on advanced adenomas and Wald test P values adjusted for age, sex, and calcium treatment assignment; threshold for significance is P < .05.

b

Wald test P value for interaction between SNP genotype and vitamin D3 supplementation on risk of advanced adenoma. Accounting for multiple testing, threshold for significance is P < .002. Note: a significant interaction test result indicates that there is evidence for heterogeneity between the effects of vitamin D treatment on risk of advanced adenoma outcomes in the different genotype subgroups. The individual estimates and their 95%CIs show how they differ. A significant test of interaction result does not imply that the estimates in each subgroup are necessarily statistically significant.

c

Post hoc analysis of dominant genetic model.