Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jul 20.
Published in final edited form as: Mol Cell. 2017 Jul 6;67(2):322–333.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.06.007

Table 1. Cryo-EM Data Collection and Structure Determination Statistics.

Data collection

 Electron energy (kV) 200
 Electron dose (e-2) 50
 Pixel size corresponding to the physical detector sensor (Å) 0.98
 Defocus range (μm) -3.0 to -1.0
 Number of micrographs 16,111

Structure determination of the non-AAA subcomplex

Cryo-EM refinement
 Number of particles used in refinement 117,471
 Final Resolution of RP complex (Å) 4.5
 Isotropic B-factor of RP complex (Å2) -90
Pseudo-crystallographic refinement of atomic model
 Cell dimension a, b, c(Å) 250.9,250.9,250.9
 Cell angle α, β, γ (Å) 90,90,90
 Space group P1
 Resolution range 250.88-4.5
 Number of reflections 652,468
 Number of atoms 36,739
 Rwork factor (%) 31.2
Geometric Parameters (RMSD)
 Bond length (Å) 0.0043
 Bond angle (°) 0.88
Ramachandran plot statistics
 Preferred (%) 91.0
 Allowed (%) 8.9
 Outlier (%) 0.13
MolProbity validation
 Rotamer outlier (%) 0.37
 MolProbity score 2.3
 Clashscore 15.78
 C-beta outliers 0

Conformational states of the p28-bound RP

State Particle number Resolution (Å) B-factor (Å2) Ramachandran plot (%) Rotamer outlier (%)
Favored Allowed Outlier
T1 39,520 5.7 -80 87.8 12.0 0.27 0.99
T2 27,629 6.1 -120 87.4 12.4 0.28 1.21
T3 10,891 6.8 -120 88.9 11.0 0.11 0.52
TA1 12,223 8.5 -350 81.2 18.1 0.67 0.79
TA2 11,082 8.3 -400 79.5 19.9 0.61 2.1
TA3 21,031 7.3 -350 83.6 16.0 0.41 0.72
TA4 9,004 8.3 -400 79.6 19.7 0.7 1.15
TA5 11,767 7.9 -450 83.0 16.5 0.48 0.62
TA6 11,610 8.9 -450 82.3 17.2 0.46 0.67
TA7 14,464 7.7 -450 82.0 17.6 0.36 1.05