Table 7.
Results of the multiple linear regression analysis of the impact of aircraft + road traffic noise and aircraft + railway noise on the total noise annoyance.
| Aircraft + Road Traffic | Aircraft + Railway | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | SE | p | BCI− | BCI− | V. | β | B | SE | p | BCI− | BCI− | V. | β | |
| (constant term) | 2.98 | 0.07 | ** | 2.84 | 3.12 | 0.00 | −0.25 | 2.98 | 0.08 | ** | 2.81 | 3.14 | 0.00 | −0.23 |
| LpAeq,24h—aircraft | 0.49 | 0.05 | ** | 0.40 | 0.59 | 0.00 | 0.40 | 0.46 | 0.05 | ** | 0.37 | 0.55 | 0.00 | 0.36 |
| LpAeq,24h—road traffic | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.51 | −0.07 | 0.13 | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.12 | 0.04 | ** | 0.04 | 0.21 | 0.00 | 0.10 |
| LpAeq,24h—aircraft × road traffic/railway | −0.10 | 0.04 | 0.02 | −0.18 | −0.01 | 0.00 | −0.08 | −0.03 | 0.04 | 0.52 | −0.10 | 0.05 | 0.00 | −0.02 |
| LpAeq,24h—railway/road traffic | 0.02 | 0.05 | 0.65 | −0.08 | 0.12 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.05 | 0.91 | −0.10 | 0.11 | 0.00 | 0.01 |
| method of surveying | −0.03 | 0.03 | 0.22 | -0.09 | 0.02 | 0.00 | −0.03 | −0.03 | 0.03 | 0.35 | −0.09 | 0.03 | 0.00 | −0.02 |
| gender | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.55 | −0.04 | 0.07 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.91 | −0.05 | 0.06 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| age | −0.03 | 0.03 | 0.39 | −0.09 | 0.04 | 0.00 | −0.02 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.88 | −0.06 | 0.07 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| age2 | −0.13 | 0.03 | ** | −0.18 | −0.07 | 0.00 | −0.10 | −0.17 | 0.03 | ** | −0.23 | −0.12 | 0.00 | −0.14 |
| occupancy | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.70 | −0.05 | 0.08 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.54 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | −0.02 |
| ownership of premises | 0.08 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.14 | 0.00 | 0.06 | 0.09 | 0.03 | ** | 0.03 | 0.14 | 0.00 | 0.07 |
| social status | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.25 | −0.03 | 0.10 | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.06 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.00 | 0.12 | 0.00 | 0.05 |
| migration background | −0.07 | 0.03 | 0.02 | −0.12 | −0.01 | 0.00 | −0.05 | −0.03 | 0.03 | 0.31 | −0.08 | 0.03 | 0.00 | −0.02 |
| noise sensitivity | 0.36 | 0.03 | ** | 0.31 | 0.42 | 0.00 | 0.29 | 0.29 | 0.03 | ** | 0.23 | 0.34 | 0.00 | 0.23 |
| attitude as useful (aircraft) | −0.19 | 0.03 | ** | −0.25 | −0.13 | 0.00 | −0.15 | −0.14 | 0.03 | ** | −0.20 | −0.08 | 0.00 | −0.11 |
| attitude as comfortable (aircraft) | −0.03 | 0.03 | 0.40 | −0.09 | 0.04 | 0.00 | −0.02 | −0.04 | 0.03 | 0.13 | −0.10 | 0.01 | 0.00 | −0.03 |
| attitude as harmful to the env. (aircraft) | −0.11 | 0.03 | ** | −0.17 | −0.05 | 0.00 | −0.09 | −0.24 | 0.03 | ** | −0.30 | −0.19 | 0.00 | −0.19 |
| attitude as useful (road traffic/railway) | −0.05 | 0.03 | 0.10 | −0.11 | 0.01 | 0.00 | −0.04 | −0.05 | 0.03 | 0.11 | −0.10 | 0.01 | 0.00 | −0.04 |
| attitude as comfortable (road traffic/railway) | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.47 | −0.04 | 0.08 | 0.00 | 0.02 | −0.01 | 0.03 | 0.85 | −0.07 | 0.05 | 0.00 | −0.01 |
| attitude as harmful to the env. (road traffic/railway) | −0.04 | 0.03 | 0.19 | −0.09 | 0.02 | 0.00 | −0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.29 | −0.03 | 0.09 | 0.00 | 0.03 |
| interaction: mode of surveying × age | −0.02 | 0.03 | 0.58 | −0.07 | 0.04 | 0.00 | −0.01 | −0.03 | 0.03 | 0.32 | −0.08 | 0.03 | 0.00 | −0.02 |
| AIC | 4150.07 | 5332.41 | ||||||||||||
Note. B = regression coefficient; SE = standard error; p = significance level (** p < 0.001); β = standardized regression coefficient; CI−/+ = lower and upper limit of the 95% confidence interval; BCI−/+ = lower/upper limit of the 95% bootstrap confidence interval; V. = bias; AIC = Akaike information criterion.