Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 16;14(8):921. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14080921

Table 1.

Associations between benzene exposure and promoter DNA methylation in ERCC3.

CpG Unit a In Relation to TSS Control (n = 24) Mean ± SD (Cm%) Exposure (n = 76) Mean ± SD (Cm%) Beta SE p Value FDR Value
1 −62 bp 3.04 ± 2.69 3.87 ± 3.94 0.07 0.19 0.725 0.725
2–4 −43 bp 4.92 ± 1.53 5.86 ± 2.77 0.19 0.09 0.032 * 0.176
5 −36 bp 1.38 ± 1.66 2.51 ± 3.44 0.32 0.18 0.082 0.226
6 −19 bp 1.21 ± 2.02 2.74 ± 3.90 0.28 0.20 0.153 0.281
7 −9 bp 4.54 ± 3.11 4.69 ± 4.03 0.09 0.18 0.626 0.689
9–10 +30 bp 6.96 ± 3.13 7.74 ± 3.49 0.15 0.09 0.107 0.235
11 +56 bp 1.15 ± 1.68 2.81 ± 4.36 0.21 0.38 0.576 0.689
13–14 +71 bp 6.46 ± 4.96 7.47 ± 5.50 0.19 0.19 0.317 0.436
15–16 +87 bp 1.54 ± 2.06 3.04 ± 3.85 0.39 0.20 0.059 0.216
17–18 +99 bp 6.79 ± 2.50 8.45 ± 4.09 0.24 0.11 0.024 * 0.176

a data missing due to low signal/noise ratio by MALDI-TOF MS. Cm%: methylated cytosine percentage; FDR: false discovery rate. Linear regression models were adjusted for sex, age, alcohol drinking,smoking status, body mass index, and percentage of lymphocytes, neutrophils and monocytes. * p value < 0.05.