Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 16;8(32):53664–53674. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.15399

Table 3a. Comparison of CT features between intermediate grade group and high grade group (mean ± SD of each parameter, Student's t-test for the comparison).

CT features Pathologic grade P value
Intermediate (n = 113) High (n = 35)
F17 Surface: Volume Ratio 0.702 ± 0.280 0.565 ± 0.260 0.011
F18 Compactness 1 13.106 ± 7.862 19.697 ± 13.236 0.008
F19 Compactness 2 0.133 ± 0.034 0.137 ± 0.030 0.538
F20 Maximum 3D Diameter 29.480 ± 11.435 33.541 ± 12.300 0.073
F22 Sphericity 0.507 ± 0.045 0.513 ± 0.040 0.481
F35 IMC1 −1.929 ± 0.090 −1.871 ± 0.101 0.002
F44 SRE 0.911 ± 0.020 0.913 ± 0.021 0.546
F45 LRE 3.890 ± 1.814 4.026 ± 1.425 0.686
F48 RP 0.936 ± 0.018 0.924 ± 0.022 0.001