Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychooncology. 2016 Sep 15;26(11):1907–1913. doi: 10.1002/pon.4255

Table 3.

Regression Results: Baseline Sedentary Time as Predictor of Fatigue and QOL

FACIT-F FACT-B
Self-Reported Sedentary Time b=6.8 × 10−4( SE=1.0 × 10−3), p=0.50 b=3 × 10−5(SE=5.9 × 10−4) p=.96
Sitting × 12 week b=4.2 × 10−4(SE=1.0 × 10−3), p=0.68 b =6.0 × 10−4(SE=4.9 × 10−4) p=.22
Sitting × 24 Week b=2.8 × 10−4(SE=1.1 × 10−3), p=0.79 b=1.2 × 10−3(SE=5.0 × 10−4), p=.01
Objectively Measured Sedentary Time b=1.1 × 10−3(SE=1.5 × 10−3), p=0.43 b=1.4 × 10−3(SE=8.7 × 10−4), p=0.11
Sitting × 12 week b=5.2 × 10−6(SE=1.4 × 10−3), p=0.99 b=1.6 × 10−3(SE=6.9 × 10−4), p=0.02
Sitting × 24 Week b=3.5 × 10−4(SE=1.5 × 10−3), p=0.81 b=−6.2 × 10−6(SE=7.1 × 10−4), p=0.38

Estimates are unstandardized regression coefficients. Main effects of sitting time are presented first in each cell followed by the interaction between time and sitting time. Models adjust for group, chemotherapy and occupation.