Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: World J Biol Psychiatry. 2017 Mar 1;19(6):450–460. doi: 10.1080/15622975.2017.1287952

Table 1.

Summary of the clusters that showed a significant correlation (PFWE < 0.01) between brain activity and the predictors. The upper part of the table shows the clusters correlating with activity for the mean working memory contrast, the bottom part of the table shows those associated with memory load.

Mean working memory
Contrast Direction Region X Y Z Size Zmax Cohen’s f2
ADHD Negative L Frontal Pole, Superior Frontal Gyrus −4 42 56 918 4.09 .011
Anxiety N/A
ADHD * Anxiety Negative R Cerebellar Crus I, Crus II VIIIa 18 −88 −34 762 3.54 .028
Memory load difference
Contrast Direction Region X Y Z Size Zmax Cohen’s f2
ADHD N/A
Anxiety N/A
ADHD * Anxiety Negative R Thalamus, Caudate, Putamen 12 −18 16 682 4.46 .047
Negative L Thalamus, Caudate, Putamen, Pallidum −20 0 0 516 3.93 .055

Note: X, Y, Z coordinates are in MNI-space in mm, and represent the peak of the cluster. The anatomical labels are according to the Harvard-Oxford atlas. MNI=Montreal Neurological Institute; Zmax= Z-score at the peak of the cluster.