Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Mar 25.
Published in final edited form as: J Biopharm Stat. 2017 Mar 25;27(6):1028–1042. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2017.1293076

Table 3.

Simulation results evaluating the bias and MSE of the estimated MTD for Scenarios 1 through 6 assuming an additive dosing scheme (Dosing Scheme 1) and a geometric dosing scheme (Dosing Scheme 2) for a maximum sample size of N = 21.

Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3 Scenario 4 Scenario 5 Scenario 6
Method Bias MSE Bias MSE Bias MSE Bias MSE Bias MSE Bias MSE

Dosing Scheme 1
CRM −1.4 2 0.2 0.1 −11.9 140.6 1.1 1.1 −0.4 0.2 2.7 7.1
rCRM1 −1.7 2.8 1.1 1.3 −12.3 150.4 0.1 0.02 −0.6 0.3 2.9 8.3
rCRM2 −1.6 2.6 0.8 0.7 −12.6 159.4 0.6 0.4 0 0.002 2.8 8
CRM − ET −2.8 7.7 1.2 1.4 −17 287.8 −2 4.1 −1.6 2.4 −0.1 0.01
Hybrid − co 3 −1.7 3 0.5 0.2 −11.5 131.9 0.3 0.1 −1 1.1 3.2 10
Hybrid − co 2 −1.2 1.5 0.6 0.3 −12.2 149.7 0.7 0.5 −1.1 1.1 2.2 4.7