Table 3.
Simulation results evaluating the bias and MSE of the estimated MTD for Scenarios 1 through 6 assuming an additive dosing scheme (Dosing Scheme 1) and a geometric dosing scheme (Dosing Scheme 2) for a maximum sample size of N = 21.
| Scenario 1 | Scenario 2 | Scenario 3 | Scenario 4 | Scenario 5 | Scenario 6 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Method | Bias | MSE | Bias | MSE | Bias | MSE | Bias | MSE | Bias | MSE | Bias | MSE |
|
| ||||||||||||
| Dosing Scheme 1 | ||||||||||||
| CRM | −1.4 | 2 | 0.2 | 0.1 | −11.9 | 140.6 | 1.1 | 1.1 | −0.4 | 0.2 | 2.7 | 7.1 |
| rCRM1 | −1.7 | 2.8 | 1.1 | 1.3 | −12.3 | 150.4 | 0.1 | 0.02 | −0.6 | 0.3 | 2.9 | 8.3 |
| rCRM2 | −1.6 | 2.6 | 0.8 | 0.7 | −12.6 | 159.4 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0 | 0.002 | 2.8 | 8 |
| CRM − ET | −2.8 | 7.7 | 1.2 | 1.4 | −17 | 287.8 | −2 | 4.1 | −1.6 | 2.4 | −0.1 | 0.01 |
| Hybrid − co 3 | −1.7 | 3 | 0.5 | 0.2 | −11.5 | 131.9 | 0.3 | 0.1 | −1 | 1.1 | 3.2 | 10 |
| Hybrid − co 2 | −1.2 | 1.5 | 0.6 | 0.3 | −12.2 | 149.7 | 0.7 | 0.5 | −1.1 | 1.1 | 2.2 | 4.7 |