Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 30;22(6):441–449. doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2017.08.001

Table 4.

Evaluation of a class solution for prostate IMRT. Percentage volumes associated with organs at risk (mean [SD] or median [range]): comparison of the clinical plan (CP) and class solutions T1, T2 and Tfinal.

Metric CP T1 T2 Tfinal RM-ANOVA (P value)
[RECTUM] volume (cc) covered by 102.5%TD 0.344 (0.000–1.915) 0.115***,††† (0.000–0.439) 0.424†† (0.000–2.238) 0.194 (0.000–1.776) <0.0001
[RECTUM] % covered by 40 Gy 29.26 (7.95) 30.19 (9.50)***,††† 29.41 (9.19) 29.78 (9.24) <0.0001
[RECTUM] % covered by 65 Gy 11.22 (5.21) 10.57 (5.47)**, 11.02 (5.80) 11.15 (5.69) 0.0118
[RECTUM] % covered by 75 Gy 6.50 (3.60) 5.65 (3.65)***,††† 6.50 (4.22) 6.36 (3.98) <0.0001
[BLADDER] % covered by 60 Gy 13.23 (7.76) 16.20***,††† (9.85) 12.67 (7.71) 13.07 (8.05) <0.0001
[BLADDER] % covered by 40 Gy 22.97 (13.88) 26.28***,††† (15.82) 22.23 (13.60) 22.53 (13.96) <0.0001
[BULB] % covered by 50 Gy 0.000 (0.000–40.23) 0.000 (0.000–45.12) 0.000 (0.000–50.52) 0.000 (0.000–35.98) 0.0697
[L FEMORAL HEAD] % covered by 45 Gy 0.000 (0.000–1.328) 0.000***,††† (0.000–3.834) 0.000* (0.000–0.299) 0.000** (0.000–0.300) 0.0236
[R FEMORAL HEAD] % covered by 45 Gy 0.000 (0.000–1.861) 0.000 ***,††† (0.000–4.438) 0.000 (0.000–0.461) 0.000 (0.000–0.443) 0.0004
*

Compared to CP, P < 0.05.

**

P < 0.01.

***

P < 0.0001.

Compared to Tfinal, P < 0.05.

††

P < 0.01.

†††

P < 0.0001.