Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 30;22(6):441–449. doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2017.08.001

Table 5.

Evaluation of a class solution for prostate IMRT: Scores associated with organs at risk (median [range]): comparison of the clinical plan (CP) and class solutions T1, T2 and Tfinal.

Metric CP T1 T2 Tfinal RM-ANOVA (P value)
[RECTUM] Volume (cc) covered by 102.5%TD 0.00 (0.00–0.00) 0.00 (0.00–0.00) 0.00 (−1.13 to 0.00) 0.00 (0.00–0.00) NSa
[RECTUM] % covered by 40 Gy 10.00 (0.94–10.00) 10.00 (0.10–10.00) 10.00 (0.10–10.00) 10.00 (0.10–10.00) 0.239
[RECTUM] % covered by 65 Gy 10.00 (0.10–10.00) 10.00 (0.10–10.00) 10.00 (0.10–10.00) 10.00 (0.10–10.00) 0.6886
[RECTUM] % covered by 75 Gy 10.00 (3.75–10.00) 10.00 (2.72–10.00) 10.00 (0.100–10.00) 10.00 (2.01–10.00) 0.3182
[BLADDER] % covered by 60 Gy 5.00 (1.74–5.00) 5.00 (0.00–5.00) 5.00 (0.00–5.00) 5.00 (1.14–5.00) 0.9504
[BLADDER] % covered by 40 Gy 5.00 (0.00–5.00) 5.00 (0.00–5.00) 5.00 (0.00–5.00) 5.00 (0.00–5.00) 0.8846
[BULB] % covered by 50 Gy 2.00 (2.00–2.00) 2.00 (2.00–2.00) 2.00 (2.00–2.00) 2.00 (2.00–2.00) 1.0a
[L FEMORAL HEAD] % covered by 45 Gy 2.00 (2.00–2.00) 2.00 (0.85–2.00) 2.00 (2.00–2.00) 2.00 (2.00–2.00) 0.9922
[R FEMORAL HEAD] % covered by 45 Gy 2.00 (2.00–2.00) 2.00 (0.47–2.00) 2.00 (2.00–2.00) 2.00 (2.00–2.00) 0.9922
a

NS, not significant.