Table 4.
SAM | MSAM1 | MSAM2 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gene | rank | rank | rank | ||||
fgd457-670_at | −4.82 | −25.45 | 1 | −19.78 | 1 | −8.62 | 3 |
fgd159-550_at | −5.13 | −24.58 | 2 | −19.20 | 2 | −9.27 | 2 |
fgd159-600_at | −5.38 | −18.24 | 6 | −14.10 | 6 | −8.12 | 4 |
fg03534_s_at | −4.48 | −14.70 | 7 | −10.29 | 7 | −5.64 | 7 |
fg03540_s_at | −3.34 | −13.56 | 8 | −9.97 | 9 | −5.02 | 14 |
fgd321-60_at | −3.71 | −13.26 | 9 | −9.50 | 10 | −5.28 | 10 |
fg03539_at | −3.80 | −13.21 | 10 | −10.07 | 8 | −5.19 | 12 |
fgd159-500_at | −3.66 | −12.49 | 11 | −9.01 | 11 | −5.39 | 9 |
fgd159-520_at | −5.08 | −11.60 | 12 | −8.70 | 12 | −5.62 | 8 |
fgd159-540_at | −4.06 | −10.73 | 18 | −8.59 | 13 | −5.03 | 13 |
fgd4-170_at | −4.98 | −9.22 | 26 | −7.58 | 21 | −5.21 | 11 |
Rank sum | 110 | 100 | 93 |
Note: the best performance in terms of rank sum is shown in bold type