Table 2.
Best fit material parameters for the Rausch-Humphrey model†
| Patient sample number | Parameters of the Rausch-Humphrey model See Eqs.(5) and (6) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| λ | μ0 | μ1 | β | δ | |
| US1-P3-Feb-0000 | 1.35 | 4.12E-03 | 873 | 70 | 1.21 |
| US3-P5-Apr-1811 | 1.28 | 6.46E-03 | 891 | 75 | 1.13 |
| US2-P6-Apr-1627 | 1.44 | 9.27E-03 | 903 | 60 | 1.31 |
| US1-P4-Mar-Irrad | 1.16 | 1.33E-03 | 892 | 31 | 1.10 |
| US1-P4-May-Irrad | 1.19 | 4.07E-04 | 825 | 41 | 1.08 |
| US1-P2-Feb-Scarred | 1.16 | 5.19E-03 | 899 | 33 | 1.11 |
| US1-P1-Jan-1313 | 1.54 | 2.75E-02 | 859 | 57 | 1.42 |
| US1-P1-May-0000 | 1.54 | 1.77E-03 | 866 | 57 | 1.42 |
| US1-P5-Apr-1644 | 1.26 | 1.34E-01 | 895 | 81 | 1.09 |
| US2-P5-Apr-1716 | 1.28 | 1.95E-02 | 892 | 90 | 1.10 |
| US2-P5-Apr-1747 | 1.28 | 3.49E-04 | 867 | 71 | 1.13 |
| US2-P5-May-1040 | 1.40 | 6.60E-04 | 834 | 62 | 1.26 |
| US2-P5-May-1235 | 1.44 | 3.06E-04 | 812 | 62 | 1.30 |
| US2-P6-Apr-1715 | 1.44 | 4.25E-03 | 867 | 53 | 1.32 |
| US3-P6-Apr-1808 | 1.44 | 1.72E-02 | 868 | 71 | 1.31 |
| US3-P6-May-000 | 1.40 | 8.25E-03 | 886 | 65 | 1.29 |
| US4-P6-Apr-1857 | 1.44 | 4.75E-03 | 867 | 58 | 1.33 |
| US2-P1-Jan-1334 | 1.54 | 1.33E-03 | 869 | 58 | 1.42 |
| US3-P5-Apr-1829 | 1.35 | 5.57E-03 | 879 | 70 | 1.22 |
| Average | 0.015 | 870 | 66.2 | 1.27 | |
| Standard deviation | 0.033 | 23 | 9.81 | 0.111 | |
| Count | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | |
| 95% confidence interval | 0.016 | 11 | 4.90 | 0.06 | |
†
The sample numbering scheme is the same as identified in Table 1. The rows in bold, italics have been excluded in obtaining the average, standard deviation, etc.