Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Addict Behav. 2017 Jun 16;75:17–24. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.06.010

Table 1.

Articles on Internet Gaming Disorder Prevalence

Year Prevalence S ample size Country % Male in sample Mean Age or Range (S D) Measure Reference and sample details
2016 0.7%* N=18932 USA, UK, Canada, Germany 48.3% 18–65 (n.r.) Brief indicators checklist 1: Przybylski AK, et al. 2016

Online
Online recruitment using general marketing services Google Surveys and YouGov using joint distributions of age, gender, geographic location
2016 5.9% N=2024 Korea 50.6% 14.5 (0.5) DSM-5–9 criteria 2: Yu H, Cho J. 2016

School
Grade 8–9
Nationwide survey in 3 or more randomly-selected schools from all 15 regions (7 major metropolitan cities, 8 regional provinces)
2016 9.2%* N=1806 Lithuania 50.2% 15.8 (0.9) YDQ 3: Ustinavi ien R, et al. 2016

School
Grade 9–11
Nationally representative sample, randomly selected 20 of 56 schools in Kaunas County
2016 2.5% N=1071 Slovenia 50.2% 13.4 (0.6) IGDS9-SF 4: Pontes HM, et al. 2016

School
Grade 8
Random probability sample stratified by population density and the 12 statistical regions of Slovenia
2016 5.2% N=3967 Germany 54.5% 15.5 (1.6) AICA-S 5: Dreier M, et al. 2016

School
Grade 9–12
41 randomly selected secondary schools from state of Rhineland-Palatinate
2016 2.3% N=5983 Switzerland 100% 20.3 (1.3) GAS 6: Khazaal Y, et al. 2016

Military
C-SURF (Cohort Study on Substance Use Risk Factors), from 3 of 6 national army recruitment centers
2016 9.1% N=293 Finland 51% 18.7 (3.4) GAS 7: Männikkö N, et al. 2015

Geographic
Randomly selected from Finland National Registry, stratified and balanced for age (13–24) and gender
2015 3.6% N=8807 Europe (Estonia, Germany, Italy, Romania, Spain) 44.5% 15 (1.3) YDQ 8: Strittmatter E, et al. 2015

School
WE-STAY (Working in Europe to Stop Truancy Among Youth) project: 132 Randomly selected secondary schools from several countries
2015 1.2% N=11003 Germany 51.1% 14.9 (0.7) DSM-5 IGD criteria
CSAS 18-item
9: Rehbein F, et al. 2015

School
Grade 9
Random selection from each tier of lower, middle, and higher levels of academic achievement in state of Lower Saxony
2015 5.5% N=5003 Japan n.r. 20–89 (n.r.) Yes/no self-report 10: Shiue I. 2015

Geographic
JGSS (Japanese General Social Survey): National survey, two-stage stratified random sampling by household interview
2015 1.6% N=12938 Europe (Germany, Greece, Iceland, Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Spain) 47.1% 14–17 (n.r.) AICA-S 11: Müller KW, et al. 2015

School
Grade 10
Random probability sample with stratification based on region and population density
2014 5.3% N=1020 Iran 50% n.r. (n.r.) DSM4, in-person interview 12: Ahmadi J, et al. 2014

School
Grade 9–11
Random selection by area and cluster sampling from high schools in Shiraz
2014 15.6% N=503 Hong Kong 49.5% 14.6 (1.4) GAS Chinese 13: Wang CW, et al. 2014

School
Grade 8–11
Two randomly selected schools from Central District and Kowloon East districts
2014 3.4%* N=24103 China 53.3 12.8 (1.8) YDQ 14: Li Y, et al. 2014

School
Grades 4–9
NCSC (National Children’s Study of China): 100 counties stratified sampling from all 31 provinces
2013 5.1%* N=1287 Australia 49.6% 14.8 (1.5) PTU scale 15. King DL, et al. 2013

School
Random selection of 50 secondary schools in outer metropolitan region of Adelaide
2013 4.6% N=2804 Hungary 51% 16.4 (0.9) POGQ-SF 16: Pápay O, et al. 2013

School
Grade 8–10
ESPAD (European School Survey Project on Alcohol and Other Drugs): internationally homogenous stratified sampling based on region, grade, class type
2013 3.9%* N=5122 China 49.6% 15.9 (n.r.) DRM 52 scale 17: Xu J, et al. 2012

School
Grade 7–11
Stratified cluster random sampling of 16 schools from 19 administrative districts of Shanghai
2012 2.6%* N=11956 Europe (Austria, Estonia, France, Germany, Hungary, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Romania, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden) 43.7% 14.9 (n.r.) YDQ 18: Durkee T, et al. 2012

School
SEYLE (Saving and Empowering Young Lives in Europe): 178 randomly selected schools within 11 study sites
2011 1.4% N=866 Greece 46.7% 14.7 (n.r.) IAT 19: Kormas G, et al. 2011

School
Grade 9–10
Random cluster sample of 20 schools, stratified by locality and population density in Athens
2011 7.6%L N=3034 Singapore 72.7% male (T1) n.r. (n.r.) 10-item scale 20: Gentile DA, et al. 2011

School
Grade 3–8
12 schools widely distributed across East, West, South, North regions in Singapore
2011 1.6% L N=1572 (T1), 1476 (T2) Netherlands 49% (T1), 52% (T2) 14.4 (1.2) (T1), 14.3 (1.0) (T2) CIUS 21: Van Rooij AJ, et al. 2011

School
Dutch “Monitor Study Internet and Youth”: stratified sample of 12 schools based on region, urbanization, and education level
2011 4% L N=1024 (T1), 941 (T2) Netherlands 51% 13.9 (1.4) T1, 14.3 (1.4) T2 7-item scale 22: Lemmens JS, et al. 2011

School
4 schools in urban and suburban districts in the Netherlands
2010 4.9% N=4028 USA 45.8% 14–18 (n.r.) 3-item scale 23: Desai RA, et al. 2010

School
10 high schools self-selected and targeted to all representative geographic regions of the state of Connecticut
2010 0.9%* N=3405 Norway 51.1% n.r. (n.r.) 4-item scale 24: Wenzel HG, et al. 2009

Geographic
National population database random sample stratified by gender, age, and country
2009 8.5%* N=1178 USA 49.9% n.r. (n.r.) 11-item scale 25: Gentile D. 2009

Online
Stratified random sample recruited through password-protected mail invitations from Harris Polls; found to be regionally and ethnically nationally representative
2007 8.1%L N=517 Taiwan 51.6% 13.6 (0.9) CIAS 26: Ko CH, et al. 2007

School
Grade 7–8
Randomly selected by cluster sampling from 3 schools in southern Taiwan
2007 3.5%* N=627 Korea 77.8% 15.9 (0.9) Korean IAT 40-items 27: Lee M S, et al. 2007

School
One high school and two middle schools in southeast Seoul
*

Small calculations (averaging, simple arithmetic) were used to arrive at a percentage value.

L

For longitudinal studies, the most recent percentage was used to reflect the value closest to publication year.

n.r. = not reported